ARC Advance Timber Hub Project “An Open-Data Framework for Forest-to-Building Value Chain Mapping” is addressing a major challenge for Australia’s forest and wood products sector: how to better understand, visualise and coordinate data across the entire value chain – from forest resource through processing to buildings.
Project Leader, Associate Professor Joe Gattas, from The University of Queensland School of Civil Engineering, presented at the FWPA Webinar – Navigating a Changing Landscape: Challenges, Opportunities, and Innovation in the Timber Industry, on the 21st April 2026. Below is a summary of the projects research outlined in the webinar presentation.
Why this research matters?
Research and data relevant to timber supply, processing and use are currently spread across many institutions, projects and datasets. This makes it difficult for industry, government and researchers to:
- See how domestic timber resources are really being used
- Identify inefficiencies and lost opportunities across the supply chain
- Test how changes in forestry, processing or building design affect outcomes such as resource efficiency, supply resilience and local manufacturing capability
This project responds by creating an open, integrated data framework that supports clearer communication, better decision‑making and more coordinated action across the sector.
What the project has achieved so far?
Measuring Timber Consumption
Early work has explored different ways to measure timber consumption in buildings.
- A geospatial “Timber Tracker” mapped timber volume per building across regions, helping separate housing density from timber use. While visually powerful, it offered limited insight for decision‑making.
- A “trees per building” material flow analysis followed timber from forest through sawmilling into a typical house, revealing the significant gap between the timber seen in a finished building and the processing effort required to produce it. This highlighted how grade recovery and product choices significantly affect resource efficiency.
Together, these early studies helped reframe timber use as a system‑wide issue, not just a building‑level metric.
Complementary Models
The project has now progressed to linking two complementary models:
- A production model, tracing timber from forest resource to recovered products, including sawn timber and co‑products such as panel products and mill residues.
- A consumption model, tracking how much timber is used by different building types.
By linking these models, the framework can trace timber flows from forest resource through to specific building outcomes, bridging established construction markets (such as lightweight timber framing in detached and low‑rise housing) with mass‑ and hybrid‑timber applications.
Frame-and-Truss Fabrication Data
A major advance has been the use of detailed frame‑and‑truss fabrication data, developed in collaboration with industry partner Multinail.
Using data from 53 real residential projects, timber use has been analysed by:
- Structural subsystem (walls, floors and roofs)
- Component type
- Size, length and grade of timber
The findings – now being prepared for publication – shows where timber is used within typical housing and confirms the dominance of machine‑graded pine (MGP). This level of detail enables far more accurate modelling than previous high‑level estimates.
What-If Scenarios
With production and consumption models now linked, the framework can be used to explore “what if?” scenarios. For example:
- How would changes in framing design alter sawmill input requirements?
- Could fibre or grade substitution increase timber use while reducing overall processing effort?
This capability gives sawmillers, fabricators and builders a shared, evidence‑based platform for practical discussions about improvement, and provides the foundation for commercial case studies being taken forward with industry partners.
What is next?
The next phase of the project will focus on:
- Finalising and publishing the detailed fabrication data analysis
- Applying the framework to additional building types, including mass‑ and hybrid‑timber projects
- Working with industry partners to test real‑world scenarios to support investment and design decisions
By making timber flows clearer, comparable and open, the project is helping industry and policymakers understand how changes at one point in the system affect the whole – supporting smarter use of Australia’s domestic timber resources.
Learn more
Conference Paper: TIMBERTRACKER: AN OPEN-SOURCE WEB FRAMEWORK FOR VISUALISING SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN FUTURE CONSTRUCTION TIMBER VALUE CHAINS
For further information or to follow project progress, visit the project page:
An Open-Data Framework for Forest-to-Building Value Chain Mapping – ARC Advance Timber Hub
An Open-Data Framework for Forest-to-Building Value Chain Mapping






Key insights to date
Key progress to date includes:
At the core of the project is the use of structural mass timber, with CLT forming the primary floor and roof system. Concrete and steel were deliberately limited to areas where they were functionally unavoidable, such as the ground slab, externally suspended walkways, lift core and select structural external columns. This material substitution reduced total carbon emissions for the project by 173.4 tonnes of CO₂, equivalent to taking 37 cars off the road for one year. The entire building required only 2 hectares of forest, which could be regrown in Australian plantation forests in approximately 18 minutes.
Inala Infill Apartments provides a clear example of how MMC and prefabricated timber systems can de‑risk delivery and improve productivity in mid‑rise residential projects. XLam CLT panels, manufactured to precise dimensions using computer numerical control (CNC), minimised waste and enabled rapid on‑site assembly.
Beyond embodied carbon and construction performance, the project demonstrates the health and wellbeing benefits of exposed mass timber. CLT ceilings are left visible throughout the apartments, reducing reliance on plasterboard and paint finishes and significantly lowering volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions at occupation. This contributes to improved indoor air quality and long‑term occupant comfort.
The apartments are configured to maximise passive environmental performance, reducing operational energy demand. Each dwelling includes dual balconies, enabling effective cross‑ventilation and passive cooling. The layout supports “diurnal migration”, allowing residents to move between balconies to occupy cooler areas of the apartment throughout the day and reducing reliance on mechanical systems.
Recognised as an exemplar by the Queensland Department of Housing and Public Works and the NSW Government Architect, the Inala Infill Apartments project has been included in government design guidance for the wider design community and general public. Showcased in the
